Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 04:29

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Walking more may lower your risk for chronic low back pain by 23%, study suggests - KSL.com
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
NBA Finals Game 2 Spread: The History Behind Big Thunder-Pacers Line - Action Network
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Why does he text me first but when I never text first he gets mad?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
How Long Of A Ride Is Mario Kart World? - Kotaku
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Scientists Confirm Anti-Aging Drug Appears to Prolong Life in Animals - ScienceAlert
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What does it feel like when a guy cums in your ass?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Analysts Look to Tesla’s Robotaxi Launch After Stock Hit From Musk-Trump Spat - Investopedia